Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SYCL][E2E][Joint Matrix] New test transpose A and B #16684

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 28, 2025

Conversation

YuriPlyakhin
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@YuriPlyakhin YuriPlyakhin force-pushed the jm_colmajor_ab_store_test branch from 2843979 to e49af63 Compare January 27, 2025 21:49
@YuriPlyakhin YuriPlyakhin marked this pull request as ready for review January 27, 2025 21:54
@YuriPlyakhin YuriPlyakhin requested a review from a team as a code owner January 27, 2025 21:54
#include "common.hpp"
#include <sycl/usm.hpp>

template <typename T, size_t TileRows, size_t TileCols> class MT;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should "use" be added to the template as well as we may have the three to be the same for both a and b matrices (like 16x16x16 combinations)?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I prefer not to add something that is not used currently. It is easy to extend, when it is needed.

bool int8_run = false;

for (auto &combination : combinations) {
if (!bf16_run && combination.atype == matrix_type::bf16) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we should add the big combinations as well.
If these are not supported yet, comment them out and add jira in the comment.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I plan to add them later in the next PRs, when I start working on them in IGC.

@YuriPlyakhin YuriPlyakhin requested a review from dkhaldi January 28, 2025 16:56
Copy link
Contributor

@dkhaldi dkhaldi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@YuriPlyakhin
Copy link
Contributor Author

@intel/llvm-gatekeepers , all green, please, merge

@againull againull merged commit 981e745 into intel:sycl Jan 28, 2025
16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants